Skip to main content

Processing BCC's in Exchange Transport Agents

One of the most important learning points when thinking about programing or designing Transport agents is to understand the different between a P1 (Delivery Envelope) and P2 (Display Envelope)

The P1 (Delivery Envelope) contains the recipient To and From information that is transmitted to the MTA server be it Exchange or any other SMTP server in the SMTP conversation and is the actual information that will be used for delivery of the message. Eg the Evaluating MTA will only examine the P1 recipients to determine what recipients a message would be delivered to.

The P2(Display Envelope) contains all the information that that the user will see when they receive the message this includes the From, To ,CC and Subject of a message. The important point to understand is that the MTA that is processing the message doesn’t look at these headers to determine whom to deliver the message to.

BCC’s

One of the things that confuses a lot of people when they look at messages via an API or within an Transport Agent is that most API’s include the ability to set and get BCC address’s but they will always appear blank when you attempt to read them for example when a message is passing through the transport pipeline. The simple explanation for this is if you have understood about P1 and P2 recipients is that BCC’s when a message is submitted become P1 recipients of the message for the first MTA to process but they are never added to the P2 envelope. From the MTA’s perspective because delivery of TO, CC or BCC are treated exactly the same these elements are merely display information and the MTA just treats these recipients as another RCPT TO entry. To detect BCC in a Transport Agent you can do two things the first is reconcile the P1 Recipients against the P2 Recipients if you find a P1 recipient that doesn’t have a matching P2 entry then you can assume that this is either a BCC or potentially an alternate or journal recipient. The other way is to look at the Microsoft.Exchange.Transport.RecipientP2Type http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa579279%28EXCHG.140%29.aspx EnvelopeRecipient.Properties Property this returns an Integer that tells you what type of recipient each P1 envelope entry is.

For example

foreach (EnvelopeRecipient envelopeRecp in QueuedMessage.MailItem.Recipients) {
object RecpType = null;
if (envelopeRecp.Properties.TryGetValue("Microsoft.Exchange.Transport.RecipientP2Type",out RecpType))
{
switch((Int32)RecpType){
case 1 : // Process To
break;
case 2 : // Process CC
break;
case 3 : // Process BCC
break;
}
}
}

Popular posts from this blog

Testing and Sending email via SMTP using Opportunistic TLS and oAuth in Office365 with PowerShell

As well as EWS and Remote PowerShell (RPS) other mail protocols POP3, IMAP and SMTP have had OAuth authentication enabled in Exchange Online (Official announcement here ). A while ago I created  this script that used Opportunistic TLS to perform a Telnet style test against a SMTP server using SMTP AUTH. Now that oAuth authentication has been enabled in office365 I've updated this script to be able to use oAuth instead of SMTP Auth to test against Office365. I've also included a function to actually send a Message. Token Acquisition  To Send a Mail using oAuth you first need to get an Access token from Azure AD there are plenty of ways of doing this in PowerShell. You could use a library like MSAL or ADAL (just google your favoured method) or use a library less approach which I've included with this script . Whatever way you do this you need to make sure that your application registration  https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/quickstart-register-

How to test SMTP using Opportunistic TLS with Powershell and grab the public certificate a SMTP server is using

Most email services these day employ Opportunistic TLS when trying to send Messages which means that wherever possible the Messages will be encrypted rather then the plain text legacy of SMTP.  This method was defined in RFC 3207 "SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over Transport Layer Security" and  there's a quite a good explanation of Opportunistic TLS on Wikipedia  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunistic_TLS .  This is used for both Server to Server (eg MTA to MTA) and Client to server (Eg a Message client like Outlook which acts as a MSA) the later being generally Authenticated. Basically it allows you to have a normal plain text SMTP conversation that is then upgraded to TLS using the STARTTLS verb. Not all servers will support this verb so if its not supported then a message is just sent as Plain text. TLS relies on PKI certificates and the administrative issue s that come around certificate management like expired certificates which is why I wrote th

The MailboxConcurrency limit and using Batching in the Microsoft Graph API

If your getting an error such as Application is over its MailboxConcurrency limit while using the Microsoft Graph API this post may help you understand why. Background   The Mailbox  concurrency limit when your using the Graph API is 4 as per https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/throttling#outlook-service-limits . This is evaluated for each app ID and mailbox combination so this means you can have different apps running under the same credentials and the poor behavior of one won't cause the other to be throttled. If you compared that to EWS you could have up to 27 concurrent connections but they are shared across all apps on a first come first served basis. Batching Batching in the Graph API is a way of combining multiple requests into a single HTTP request. Batching in the Exchange Mail API's EWS and MAPI has been around for a long time and its common, for email Apps to process large numbers of smaller items for a variety of reasons.  Batching in the Graph is limited to a m
All sample scripts and source code is provided by for illustrative purposes only. All examples are untested in different environments and therefore, I cannot guarantee or imply reliability, serviceability, or function of these programs.

All code contained herein is provided to you "AS IS" without any warranties of any kind. The implied warranties of non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are expressly disclaimed.