Skip to main content

Reading custom MAPI properties in a Transport Agent

In Exchange 2007 and 2010 all mail that is sent and received must transit its way through a Hub server where if your a developer you can create a transport agent to perform additional tasks on those messages before the are passed out of your org or into a mailbox. Sometimes these tasks may involve custom mapi properties that you may have created by using customized forms in Outlook or OWA or possibly a custom EWS application. When it comes to accessing these custom properties in a Transport Agent it involves using the TNEFReader in a transport agent to parse TNEF part of a message.

TNEF for those uninitiated stands for Transport Neutral Encapsulation Format which is a serialization format that Exchange uses to send the Mapi properties of a Item via email there is a protocol document that covers this http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc425498%28v=EXCHG.80%29.aspx. What the TNEFReader does is allows a Transport Agent to parse all the different property structures and data-types contained within the TNEF data stream.

One of the harder things to understand when dealing with Mapi properties is that they come in two different types. The following http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc979184.aspx page describes the difference between tagged properties and named properties. And there are different properties for different parts of a messages for instance there are Item properties for the Item, Recipient properties in the recipients collection for each recipients and attachment properties for each attachment. So when you are parsing an Item its not just as simple as reading one particular property collection (depending on what your trying to do).

For custom properties these should always be named properties and for the most they will use the PS_PUBLIC_STRINGS property set (but you may have created your own custom propset GUID) and either a long ID (LID) or String value for the PropertyName. This can all be confirmed using a Mapi Editor like MFCMapi or OutlookSpy to look at an item where this property has been set.

When you have gathered all this information your ready to use the property in your Transport Agent. The first thing to do when parsing a TNEF part in a transport agent is to work out at what level or properties you want to parse eg the Message properties or the attachment properties or possibly an embedded attachments properties (an Item attachment). The TNEFReader parses the properties in a forward direction to test if a property is a named property you use the

reader.PropertyReader.IsNamedProperty

If you want to check the propset GUID

reader.PropertyReader.PropertyNameId.PropertySetGuid

To see if this property is using a LID or String

reader.PropertyReader.PropertyNameId.Kind == TnefNameIdKind.Name

To demonstrate this I've put together a sample that pushes a particular custom property into a x-header which i find it useful for a number of things. I've put a download of the code here the agent looks like

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Text;
using System.Collections;
using System.Diagnostics;
using Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Transport;
using Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Mime;
using Microsoft.Exchange.Data.ContentTypes.Tnef;
using Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Transport.Email;
using Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Transport.Routing;
using Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Common;
using System.IO;
using Microsoft.Win32;
using System.Reflection;

namespace ExchangeRoutingAgents
{
public class MapiPropAgentFactory : RoutingAgentFactory
{
public override RoutingAgent CreateAgent(SmtpServer server)
{
RoutingAgent mpAgent = new MapiPropAgent();
return mpAgent;
}
}
}

public class MapiPropAgent : RoutingAgent
{
public MapiPropAgent()
{
this.OnRoutedMessage += new RoutedMessageEventHandler(MapiPropAgent_OnRoutedMessage);
}
void MapiPropAgent_OnRoutedMessage(RoutedMessageEventSource esEvtsource, QueuedMessageEventArgs qmQueuedMessage)
{
String myPropString = "myExtraInfo";
MimePart tnefPart = qmQueuedMessage.MailItem.Message.TnefPart;
if (tnefPart != null)
{
//Check the Mimeheader to see if the X-header exists
MimeDocument mdMimeDoc = qmQueuedMessage.MailItem.Message.MimeDocument;
HeaderList hlHeaderlist = mdMimeDoc.RootPart.Headers;
Header myPropHeader = hlHeaderlist.FindFirst(myPropString);
TnefReader reader = new TnefReader(tnefPart.GetContentReadStream(), 0, TnefComplianceMode.Loose);
while (reader.ReadNextAttribute())
{
//Find Message Level TNEF attributes
if (reader.AttributeTag == TnefAttributeTag.MapiProperties)
{

while (reader.PropertyReader.ReadNextProperty())
{
if (reader.PropertyReader.IsNamedProperty)
{
if (reader.PropertyReader.PropertyNameId.Name == myPropString)
{

String myPropStringValue = reader.PropertyReader.ReadValueAsString();
if (myPropHeader == null)
{
MimeNode lhLasterHeader = hlHeaderlist.LastChild;
TextHeader nhNewHeader = new TextHeader(myPropString, myPropStringValue);
hlHeaderlist.InsertBefore(nhNewHeader, lhLasterHeader);
lhLasterHeader = null;
nhNewHeader = null;
}
}
}

}

}
}
reader.Dispose();
}


}


}

Popular posts from this blog

The MailboxConcurrency limit and using Batching in the Microsoft Graph API

If your getting an error such as Application is over its MailboxConcurrency limit while using the Microsoft Graph API this post may help you understand why. Background   The Mailbox  concurrency limit when your using the Graph API is 4 as per https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/throttling#outlook-service-limits . This is evaluated for each app ID and mailbox combination so this means you can have different apps running under the same credentials and the poor behavior of one won't cause the other to be throttled. If you compared that to EWS you could have up to 27 concurrent connections but they are shared across all apps on a first come first served basis. Batching Batching in the Graph API is a way of combining multiple requests into a single HTTP request. Batching in the Exchange Mail API's EWS and MAPI has been around for a long time and its common, for email Apps to process large numbers of smaller items for a variety of reasons.  Batching in the Graph is limited to a m

Sending a Message in Exchange Online via REST from an Arduino MKR1000

This is part 2 of my MKR1000 article, in this previous post  I looked at sending a Message via EWS using Basic Authentication.  In this Post I'll look at using the new Outlook REST API  which requires using OAuth authentication to get an Access Token. The prerequisites for this sketch are the same as in the other post with the addition of the ArduinoJson library  https://github.com/bblanchon/ArduinoJson  which is used to parse the Authentication Results to extract the Access Token. Also the SSL certificates for the login.windows.net  and outlook.office365.com need to be uploaded to the devices using the wifi101 Firmware updater. To use Token Authentication you need to register an Application in Azure https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/office365/howto/add-common-consent-manually  with the Mail.Send permission. The application should be a Native Client app that use the Out of Band Callback urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob. You need to authorize it in you tenant (eg build a small ap

How to test SMTP using Opportunistic TLS with Powershell and grab the public certificate a SMTP server is using

Most email services these day employ Opportunistic TLS when trying to send Messages which means that wherever possible the Messages will be encrypted rather then the plain text legacy of SMTP.  This method was defined in RFC 3207 "SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over Transport Layer Security" and  there's a quite a good explanation of Opportunistic TLS on Wikipedia  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunistic_TLS .  This is used for both Server to Server (eg MTA to MTA) and Client to server (Eg a Message client like Outlook which acts as a MSA) the later being generally Authenticated. Basically it allows you to have a normal plain text SMTP conversation that is then upgraded to TLS using the STARTTLS verb. Not all servers will support this verb so if its not supported then a message is just sent as Plain text. TLS relies on PKI certificates and the administrative issue s that come around certificate management like expired certificates which is why I wrote th
All sample scripts and source code is provided by for illustrative purposes only. All examples are untested in different environments and therefore, I cannot guarantee or imply reliability, serviceability, or function of these programs.

All code contained herein is provided to you "AS IS" without any warranties of any kind. The implied warranties of non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are expressly disclaimed.